My Name Is Khan continues to dominate the international charts. The combined total from key international markets, at the end of 10 days, is approx. Rs. 46.25 crores.
U.K. BOX-OFFICE
Note:- Collections of several films are unavailable. Hence, this list is incomplete.
* My Name Is Khan [last weekend: No. 6, this weekend: No. 9]: In its second weekend, the film has collected £ 4,48,747 on 91 screens, with the per screen average working out to £ 4,931.
Total: £ 19,60,349 [approx. Rs. 14.05 crores].
U.S.A. BOX-OFFICE
* My Name Is Khan [last weekend: No. 13, this weekend: No. 17]: In its second weekend, the film has collected $ 7,00,885 on 125 screens, with the per screen average working out to $ 5,607.
Total: $ 32,53,168 [approx. Rs. 15.01 crores].
AUSTRALIA BOX-OFFICE
* My Name Is Khan [last weekend: No. 10, this weekend: No. 15]: In its second weekend, the film has collected Aus. $ 1,73,846 on 37 screens, with the per screen average working out to Aus. $ 4,699.
Total: Aus. $ 7,62,584 [approx. Rs. 3.17 crores].
OTHER KEY MARKETS
* Singapore: USD $ 3,01,094 [approx. Rs. 1.39 crores]
* Pakistan: USD $ 3,65,298 [approx. Rs. 1.68 crores]
* East and West Africa: USD $ 1,65,260 [approx. Rs. 76.22 lacs]
* Middle East Markets: USD $ 2.21 million [approx. Rs. 10.19 crores
Sunday, February 28, 2010
My Name Is Khan looses to 3 Idiots
This is a a piece of news which will hurt the fans of Shahrukh Khan. King Khan has lost it out to the perfectionist Aamir Khan once again. Shahrukh's My Name Is Khan which had got a bombastic opening opening in it's first week has lost grip over the Box Office in it's second week and seems to be no match for Aamir's 3 Idiots. My Name Is Khan has seen a steep fall in the second week with occupancy falling as much as 60% to 80%.
This is not the first time that Shahrukh has emerged No. 2 in the race. In 2008 too Shahrukh's Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi was going well but when Aamir's Ghajini released the movie found tough to breathe. Ghajini had gone on to establish records at the Box Office which was incidentally broken by Aamir starer 3 Idiots. Now having lost two consecutive rounds to Aamir, Shahrukh will find it tough to keep his 'Baadshah of Bollywood' tag.
Related posts:
The movie had started off well thanks to the controversy created by the Shiv Sena over Shahrukh's support to the Pakistani players in the IPL. Fox Star India which is distributing the movie was excited after the movie had a better start than 3 Idiots. But My Name Is Khan seems to have lost the momentum having grossed Rs. 150 Crores in the second week compared to Rs. 240 Crores , 3 Idiots grossed in the first 10 days.
This is not the first time that Shahrukh has emerged No. 2 in the race. In 2008 too Shahrukh's Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi was going well but when Aamir's Ghajini released the movie found tough to breathe. Ghajini had gone on to establish records at the Box Office which was incidentally broken by Aamir starer 3 Idiots. Now having lost two consecutive rounds to Aamir, Shahrukh will find it tough to keep his 'Baadshah of Bollywood' tag.
Related posts:
Shah Rukh Khan's "My Name Is Khan" : Questions of religious and national identity
Friday, February 26, 2010
Kites- Realising on may 21
Banner
Filmkraft Productions (I) Pvt Ltd
Filmkraft Productions (I) Pvt Ltd
Release Date
May 21, 2010
May 21, 2010
Language
Hindi / English
Hindi / English
Genre
Thriller / Romance
Thriller / Romance
Shooting Studios
Filmistan
Filmistan
Producer
Rakesh Roshan
Sunaina Roshan
Rakesh Roshan
Sunaina Roshan
Director
Anurag Basu
Anurag Basu
Star Cast
- Hrithik Roshan
- Kangna Ranaut
- Barbara Mori
- Kabir Bedi
- Nick Brown
Cassettes and CD’s on
T-Series
T-Series
Music Director
Rajesh Roshan
Rajesh Roshan
Story / Writer
Akash Khurana
Anurag Basu
Robin Bhatt
Akash Khurana
Anurag Basu
Robin Bhatt
Hrithik Roshan starrer romantic saga ‘Kites’, which also marks the Bollywood debut of Mexican model Barbara Mori, will hit theatres worldwide on May 21.
The Hindi and English versions of ‘Kites’ will release worldwide simultaneously in 60 countries.The first trailer of the movie, which has been produced by Rakesh Roshan, distributed and marketed by Reliance Big Picture, was unveiled in 1700 screens on 12th February.
Labels:
barbara,
barbara mori,
bollywood kites,
hrithik,
hrithik barbara,
hrithik roshan,
kites,
kites bollywood,
kites movie review,
movie review kites
Thursday, February 25, 2010
God has no religion--Mahatma Gandi
If you understand, things are just as they are; if you do not understand, things are just as they are.-Zen saying
I do not cut my life up into days but my days into lives, each day, each hour, an entire life.- Juan Ramon
Jimenez
Be master of mind rather than mastered by mind.-Zen saying
No thought, no reflection, no analysis, no cultivation, no intention; let it settle itself--Tilopa
Normally, we do not so much look at things as overlook them--Alan Watts
People in the world cannot identify their own mind. They believe that what they see, or hear, or feel, or know, is mind. They are blocked, and so cannot see the brilliant spirit of their original mind.--Huang po
Ride your horse along the edge of a sword; hide yourself in the middle of flames....Zen saying
Do not mistake understanding for realization, and do not mistake realization for liberation....Tibetan Saying.
"weeds only grow when we dislike them"
If you put your conditioned intellect to rest for a long time, suddenly it will be like the bottom fallin out of a bucket -- then you will naturally be happy and at peace.- Yaunwu
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Will ‘Hurt Locker’ have an ending like ‘Brokeback’?
With wins at the Producers Guild, Directors Guild, Writers Guild, and British Academy Awards, “The “Hurt Locker” ” has clearly been racking up the major pre-Oscar prizes in the last month.
In fact, with the exception of a couple big-ticket losses at the Golden Globes and SAG Awards, Kathryn Bigelow’s film has nearly accomplished the same sweep that “Slumdog Millionaire” pulled off last year. By that yardstick, the film seems like a sure thing to win the Best Picture Oscar on March 7, particularly because those two high-profile losses came at the hands of two different films (“Avatar” at the Globes, “Inglourious Basterds” at SAG) rather than one.
But then I started looking at all ““Brokeback” Mountain’s” pre-Oscar record from four years ago and I found some striking similarities.
“Brokeback” managed the rare feat of winning Best Picture and Best Director at both the New York and Los Angeles film critics awards; so did ““Hurt Locker.” “Brokeback” also picked up those two big prizes at the Broadcast Film Critics Awards; so did “Hurt Locker.” “Brokeback” won the trifecta of PGA, DGA, and WGA trophies; so did “Hurt Locker.” “Brokeback” won 4 BAFTAs, including Best Film, Director, and Screenplay; “Hurt Locker” picked up 6 awards, including Best Film, Director, and Screenplay. And of course, “Brokeback” lost the SAG cast award, and so did “Hurt Locker.” (The main difference between the two films’ tallies is that “Brokeback” did win four Globes, including Best Drama and Best Director, while “Hurt Locker” went 0 for 3.)
All of this is on my mind right now because we’re about to put our Oscar Odds issue to bed (it’ll be on stands this Friday), and it’s really making me think twice about my prediction that The “Hurt Locker” will emerge victorious on March 7.
There’s still a distinct possibility that “Hurt Locker” will mirror “Brokeback” yet again and win three Oscars (let’s say Best Director, Best Original Screenplay, and Best Editing) but lose the big one to a more easily-digestible rival, in this case “Avatar.”
But I’m swayed by the argument (best articulated by Steve Pond over at The Wrap) that even if “Avatar” scores the most No. 1 votes, The “Hurt Locker” is likely to perform better in subsequent rounds of voting, since Bigelow’s film may have more No. 2 and No. 3 rankings than “Avatar” will. So, fully knowing that I may end up being wrong, I’m sticking with The “Hurt Locker”.
Related Posts:
"Avatar" Vs "Heart Locker" hard contest
Nominees for the 82nd academy award
Labels:
Academy Award,
avatar,
avatar vs heart locker,
celebrity,
competitive Academy Award,
hurt locker,
oscer
Monday, February 22, 2010
"Avatar" Vs "Heart Locker" hard contest
Britain's love of the underdog triumphed Sunday as intimate war drama "The Hurt Locker" beat 3D spectacular "Avatar" to take six prizes, including best picture, at the British Academy Film Awards.
The "Avatar"/"Hurt Locker" battle initially seemed like a David-and-Goliath story. Cameron's last feature, "Titanic," won 11 Oscars, including picture and director. "Avatar" is a global phenomenon that has taken more than $2 billion at the box office.
Kathryn Bigelow won the best-director battle with "Avatar"'s James Cameron, her ex-husband, for her intense depiction of a bomb-disposal squad in Iraq.
"It means so much that this film seems to be touching people's hearts and minds," Bigelow said.
Both films had eight nominations for the British awards, considered an indicator of possible success at the Academy Awards in Los Angeles next month. "Avatar" and "The Hurt Locker" each has nine Oscar nominations.
"The Hurt Locker" also took British prizes for original screenplay cinematography, editing and sound.
"Avatar" won awards for production design and visual effects for its vivid vision of a distant moon populated by a blue-skinned species called the Na'vi.
"Hurt Locker" screenwriter Mark Boal dedicated the best-film prize to the hope of peace "and bringing the boys and girls back home."
Bigelow also paid tribute to soldiers serving in Iraq, and said the goal of the film was "putting a bit of a spotlight on a very, very difficult situation."
"I hope that in some small way this film can begin a debate ... and bring closure to this conflict," she said.
David vs. Goliath?
The "Avatar"/"Hurt Locker" battle initially seemed like a David-and-Goliath story. Cameron's last feature, "Titanic," won 11 Oscars, including picture and director. "Avatar" is a global phenomenon that has taken more than $2 billion at the box office.
"Hurt Locker" has made about a hundredth that much.
"It did not seem like a slam-dunk commercial proposition," said Boal, who thanked Bigelow and the cast for making "an unpopular story about an unpopular war."
Homegrown British talent did not go home empty-handed. Rising star Carey Mulligan was named best actress for playing a precocious teenager in 1960s London in "An Education."
Colin Firth was named best actor for his performance as a bereaved Englishman in California in Tom Ford's "A Single Man."
Firth said he almost declined the award-winning role, which has also earned him an Oscar nomination. He said he had been about to turn it down by e-mail "when someone came to repair my fridge." He never sent the e-mail.
"I would like to thank the fridge guy," Firth said.
Firth said he had emerged from working with fashion designer-turned-director Ford "better groomed, more fragrant and more nominated than one has ever been before."
Austrian actor Christoph Waltz, already a hot Oscar favorite, won the supporting actor prize for his turn as a chilling, charming Nazi colonel in "Inglourious Basterds." The supporting actress award went to Mo'nique for "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire."
Director Duncan Jones took the award for best British debut for his lost-in-space drama "Moon."
A tearful Jones, whose father is musician David Bowie, said it had taken him a long time to figure out what he wanted to do with his life.
"Finally, I think I've found what I love doing," he said.
Labels:
avatar,
avatar vs heart locker,
bafta 2010,
heart locker
Situation: ‘Jersey Shore 2’ is best series ever
Mike “The Situation” Sorrentino is confident that “Jersey Shore’s” second season won’t disappoint fans of the hit MTV reality show.
“Season 1 was the best reality show in history,” he told the Chicago Tribune. “Season 2 may be the best series ever. It’s going to be legendary.”
And The Situation, whose catchphrases helped make the MTV show a household name, said he’s not preparing any material in advance for the upcoming season.
“I don’t save material,” he said. “That’s called being on the spot.”
As for what the future holds for the cast, he wasn’t sure if Ronnie Magro and Sammi “Sweetheart” Giancola were still dating.
“I think they broke up — I have no clue,” he said.
According to a previous report from TMZ, the volatile couple split after the taping of the series’ reunion show on January 21, but just days later, co-star Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi told Us Weekly that the pair had gotten back together.
“You never know with them,” Snooki said at the time.
But The Situation told the Tribune that he would be front and center when the show returned no matter what’s going on with his castmates.
“I run that house,” he said. “[Ronnie and Sammi] are the cartoon section. I’m the front page.”
Labels:
jersey shore,
jersey shore 2,
jersey shore 2 season 2,
season 2,
situation,
situation jersey shore 2
Ryan Phillippe, Abbie Cornish break up-Actress moves out of shared home; couple met during 2006 film shoot
It's over between actress Abbie Cornish and boyfriend Ryan Phillippe, her spokesperson confirms to e-celebrity exclusively.
"Abbie ended the relationship with Ryan and she moved out of their home," the rep tells e-celebrity. On Sunday, the actress was spotted removing her belongings from the house she shared with Phillippe while he visited a friend with children Ava and Deacon.
The split follows months of tabloid speculation that Phillippe has been unfaithful to Cornish — regularly hitting the nightclubs and being linked to other women. When asked about the cause of the break-up and whether Phillippe cheated on Cornish, her rep replied, "No comment."
ornish, 27, and Phillippe, 35, met in 2006 on the set of the film, "Stop-Loss," and survived intense media scrutiny following Phillippe’s divorce from Reese Witherspoon. Cornish has been in Vancouver for the last seven months shooting the film "Sucker Punch."
Reps for Phillippe could not be reached for comment.
Labels:
abbie,
abbie ryan breakup,
ornish,
ryan,
stop-loss
Movie Review- The Wolfman
Director: Joe Johnston
Screenplay: Andrew Kevin Walker, David Self, Curt Siodmak (1941 screenplay)
Actors: Anthony Hopkins, Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt, Hugo Weaving, Geraldine Chaplin
Cinematography: Shelly Johnson
Music: Danny Elfman
Release Date: February 12, 2010
Rating: 6 out of 10
Review:
The Wolfman is a remake of the popular horror classic that was produced by Universal over 60 years ago. Instead of capitalizing on a more contemporary adaptation of the character the studio decided to stick with the old plot and feel of the original. This includes the overseas location and time period, accompanied by plenty of blood and gore. This film could have been an amazing revamp of its predecessor but the excessive violence and unnecessary bloodshed ruins it all.
Lawrence Talbot, a haunted nobleman, returns to his family estate after his brother’s fiancee informs him of his death. It turns out that his sibling was murdered in the woods by a mysterious creature, who inflicted fatal wounds that weren’t of human origin. Against the advice of others he delves deep into his search, which sets a life changing event in motion. Throughout the film we try to figure out if it was destiny, a curse, or bad luck that leads him to his fate of becoming the Wolfman.
The Horror: This film was genuinely scary. There are a lot of jump scares, but they actually work and make you want to check your surroundings ever so often.
Editing: The editing here helped with building up tension and fear within the film. There were certain scenes that could only work with the right cuts at the right time, and they were able to pull that off.
The Accents: The location of the film is supposed to be near London, yet everyone’s accents are completely different. Del Toro’s is American, which they explain in the film, but Blunt and Hopkins are another story. Both actors are British in real life, yet Blunt sounded like an American doing her best British impersonation.
The Gore: There are some extremely graphic scenes that didn’t need to be shown. Every time the Wolfman appears expect to see exposed intestines, stomachs, and plenty of heads being clawed off during your viewing.
Screenplay: Andrew Kevin Walker, David Self, Curt Siodmak (1941 screenplay)
Actors: Anthony Hopkins, Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt, Hugo Weaving, Geraldine Chaplin
Cinematography: Shelly Johnson
Music: Danny Elfman
Release Date: February 12, 2010
Rating: 6 out of 10
Review:
The Wolfman is a remake of the popular horror classic that was produced by Universal over 60 years ago. Instead of capitalizing on a more contemporary adaptation of the character the studio decided to stick with the old plot and feel of the original. This includes the overseas location and time period, accompanied by plenty of blood and gore. This film could have been an amazing revamp of its predecessor but the excessive violence and unnecessary bloodshed ruins it all.
Lawrence Talbot, a haunted nobleman, returns to his family estate after his brother’s fiancee informs him of his death. It turns out that his sibling was murdered in the woods by a mysterious creature, who inflicted fatal wounds that weren’t of human origin. Against the advice of others he delves deep into his search, which sets a life changing event in motion. Throughout the film we try to figure out if it was destiny, a curse, or bad luck that leads him to his fate of becoming the Wolfman.
The Good:
Anthony Hopkins: The Oscar winning actor was the epitome of evil as Lawrence’s father. He was so emotionally detached that every time his character appeared on screen you always wondered what was going on behind his eyes.The Horror: This film was genuinely scary. There are a lot of jump scares, but they actually work and make you want to check your surroundings ever so often.
Editing: The editing here helped with building up tension and fear within the film. There were certain scenes that could only work with the right cuts at the right time, and they were able to pull that off.
The Bad:
The Direction: The cast of this film was great, but it didn’t seem like their talent shined through. It takes a good director to bring out the best in their actors, and that didn’t happen here. Joe Johnston had two Oscar winners, and a Golden Globe nominee, yet they all gave mediocre performances. It makes you wonder what type of direction he was giving them.The Accents: The location of the film is supposed to be near London, yet everyone’s accents are completely different. Del Toro’s is American, which they explain in the film, but Blunt and Hopkins are another story. Both actors are British in real life, yet Blunt sounded like an American doing her best British impersonation.
The Gore: There are some extremely graphic scenes that didn’t need to be shown. Every time the Wolfman appears expect to see exposed intestines, stomachs, and plenty of heads being clawed off during your viewing.
Overall:
There are certain elements from the original Wolfman that do appear in the remake, the only problem is those similarities are overshadowed by unnecessary blood. This is not a movie for the weak at heart or those with sensitive eyes. The Wolfman is a mixture of old school Gothic horror mixed with the Saw franchise. Does that sound like a pleasant combination to you? If so, you should definitely give it a shot this weekend.
Labels:
hopkins,
Joe Johnston,
kevin,
kevin walker,
new wolfman,
review wolfman,
The wolfman,
wolfman,
wolfman review,
wolfman2010
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Movie Review- Shutter Island
Directed by | Martin Scorsese |
---|---|
Produced by | Bradley J. Fischer Mike Medavoy Arnold W. Messer |
Written by | Laeta Kalogridis Steven Knight Dennis Lehane (Novel) |
Starring | Leonardo DiCaprio Ben Kingsley Mark Ruffalo Michelle Williams Patricia Clarkson Emily Mortimer Ted Levine John Carroll Lynch Elias Koteas Jackie Earle Haley and Max von Sydow |
Music by | Robbie Robertson |
Cinematography | Robert Richardson |
Editing by | Thelma Schoonmaker |
Studio | Phoenix Pictures Appian Way Productions Sikelia Productions |
Distributed by | Paramount Pictures |
Release date(s) | February 19, 2010 (2010-02-19) |
Running time | 138 minutes |
Country | United States |
Language | English |
Budget | $80 million |
Review:
Director Martin Scorsese's latest collaboration with Leonardo DiCaprio is a brain-scrambling good time.
The latest chapter in Martin Scorsese’s fruitful DiCaprio phase is the haunting psychological thriller Shutter Island. Based on the bestselling novel by Mystic River author Dennis Lehane, Shutter Island casts Leo as U.S. Marshal Edward “Teddy” Daniels, a World War II veteran and recent widower assigned with investigating the escape of a female inmate from Ashecliffe Hospital, a facility for the criminally insane housed on an ominous island outside Boston Harbor.
Ashecliffe Hospital is the Casa Bonita of mental institutions, a decaying, storm-battered Gothic fortress packed with raving, homicidal crazies from all sides of the lunatic spectrum. Orderlies, dressed in asylum white and almost uniformly African-American, attempt to subdue their screams, while impassive physicians subject their brains to all manner of rudimentary — and often barbaric — experimental “treatments” considered cutting-edge in the early ‘50s. (Shutter Island's story is set in 1954, back when lobotomies were regularly dispensed and homosexuality was still officially classified as a mental disorder.)
The proprietor of this madhouse is Dr. Cawley (Ben Kingsley), an effete, probing psychiatrist whose bowtie alone suggests a near-infinite capacity for evil. (Seriously — never trust any bowtie-wearer not named Pee Wee Herman. Just look at this guy.) He’s flanked by the German-born Dr. Naehring (Max Von Sydow), a vision of clinical Teutonic malevolence wrapped in a labcoat and wire-rimmed glasses. Needless to say, Marshal Daniels is immediately suspicious of both.
The case of the missing inmate proves to be something of a red herring, and Shutter Island an abrupt conspiratorial turn when Daniels reveals to his partner, Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo), his true motive for coming to Ashecliffe: Housed somewhere within its walls, he believes, is the arsonist responsible for the apartment fire that killed his wife, Dolores (Michelle Williams), just a few years prior. What’s more, Ashecliffe appears to be no mere hospital, but rather a secret government facility wherein gruesome, Nazi-inspired mind-control experiments are conducted by the House Un-American Activities Committee in the hopes of gaining an edge on the Commies.
Suddenly, faint sounds of the cuckoo alarm can be heard, and as Daniels sets out to unravel the conspiracy, the conspiracy has already begun to unravel him. Wandering through Ashecliffe’s creaking labyrinth, he's beset by haunting visions and engulfed by Scorsese’s menacing, atmospheric blend of flickering lights, leaky ceilings, violent thunderclaps, deranged inmates, and other classic crazymaking cinematic conventions. Throw in some abrupt smash cuts, a jarringly arrhythmic score, and an undercurrent of Cold War paranoia, and you've got yourself one terrifyingly potent, batsh*t crazy stew.
Sometimes too potent. Shutter Island's narrative is bedeviled by inconsistent pacing, its slow burn all too often interrupted by overlong, exposition-heavy dialogue exchanges that effectively halt the film's momentum, forcing Scorsese to build the tension again from scratch as we struggle to process the revelations that have just been dumped upon us. And its extended "I see dead people" denouement strays into the hackneyed abyss of Shyamalan-land. Thankfully for us, it doesn't linger long enough to spoil all the brain-scrambling fun.
Ashecliffe Hospital is the Casa Bonita of mental institutions, a decaying, storm-battered Gothic fortress packed with raving, homicidal crazies from all sides of the lunatic spectrum. Orderlies, dressed in asylum white and almost uniformly African-American, attempt to subdue their screams, while impassive physicians subject their brains to all manner of rudimentary — and often barbaric — experimental “treatments” considered cutting-edge in the early ‘50s. (Shutter Island's story is set in 1954, back when lobotomies were regularly dispensed and homosexuality was still officially classified as a mental disorder.)
The proprietor of this madhouse is Dr. Cawley (Ben Kingsley), an effete, probing psychiatrist whose bowtie alone suggests a near-infinite capacity for evil. (Seriously — never trust any bowtie-wearer not named Pee Wee Herman. Just look at this guy.) He’s flanked by the German-born Dr. Naehring (Max Von Sydow), a vision of clinical Teutonic malevolence wrapped in a labcoat and wire-rimmed glasses. Needless to say, Marshal Daniels is immediately suspicious of both.
The case of the missing inmate proves to be something of a red herring, and Shutter Island an abrupt conspiratorial turn when Daniels reveals to his partner, Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo), his true motive for coming to Ashecliffe: Housed somewhere within its walls, he believes, is the arsonist responsible for the apartment fire that killed his wife, Dolores (Michelle Williams), just a few years prior. What’s more, Ashecliffe appears to be no mere hospital, but rather a secret government facility wherein gruesome, Nazi-inspired mind-control experiments are conducted by the House Un-American Activities Committee in the hopes of gaining an edge on the Commies.
Suddenly, faint sounds of the cuckoo alarm can be heard, and as Daniels sets out to unravel the conspiracy, the conspiracy has already begun to unravel him. Wandering through Ashecliffe’s creaking labyrinth, he's beset by haunting visions and engulfed by Scorsese’s menacing, atmospheric blend of flickering lights, leaky ceilings, violent thunderclaps, deranged inmates, and other classic crazymaking cinematic conventions. Throw in some abrupt smash cuts, a jarringly arrhythmic score, and an undercurrent of Cold War paranoia, and you've got yourself one terrifyingly potent, batsh*t crazy stew.
Sometimes too potent. Shutter Island's narrative is bedeviled by inconsistent pacing, its slow burn all too often interrupted by overlong, exposition-heavy dialogue exchanges that effectively halt the film's momentum, forcing Scorsese to build the tension again from scratch as we struggle to process the revelations that have just been dumped upon us. And its extended "I see dead people" denouement strays into the hackneyed abyss of Shyamalan-land. Thankfully for us, it doesn't linger long enough to spoil all the brain-scrambling fun.
For more movie review, visit: http://hot-ecelebrities.blogspot.com/
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Makeover Your Ride Like Athlete's Car
You know that professional athletes are well paid, so having a fancy sport cars are a common thing for them. But how about you and me? Most of us have to work over hours just to buy one cheap car! So, one solution to make our car to have a closer appearances to athlete's car is by doing a makeover.
You can start makeover by choosing the right accessories for your ride. There are a lot of area you can working on, a change in the spoilers, body kits, wood dash kits, or chrome trim can magically make your car more attractive.
Now, what's you car brand? BMW, Dodge, Volkswagen, or maybe Lamborghini, or just some old Cadillac? Don't worry, because whatever your car is, there are always the right accessories available for you. While some of pro athletes choose Hummer as their favorite one. This goes to Dwayne Wade, LeBron James, or the cute golfer Michelle Wie.
The first time Michelle Wie ever drove a car was when she was 17, she took a Hummer up a 60-degree ramp, rocked it over some felled logs and punched it through a mud flat, all with her parents sitting in the back seat. What a girl! While King James also got his $80,000 Hummer H2 in a very young age of 18, as a gift from her mother.
With the right touch, you can make your old truck looks like those athletes Hummer. Personally, I prefer to work on the interior design for my car (assuming I have one, duh!) , especially in the dashboard area. You know what will be awesome? By having a wood dash kits instead of usual chrome or carbon fiber one. Having a customized accessories will personalized your car and reflects who you really are.
Now, I recommend you to visit Carid website to find a suitable accessories for your car, and you'll be driving in style in no time.
You can start makeover by choosing the right accessories for your ride. There are a lot of area you can working on, a change in the spoilers, body kits, wood dash kits, or chrome trim can magically make your car more attractive.
Now, what's you car brand? BMW, Dodge, Volkswagen, or maybe Lamborghini, or just some old Cadillac? Don't worry, because whatever your car is, there are always the right accessories available for you. While some of pro athletes choose Hummer as their favorite one. This goes to Dwayne Wade, LeBron James, or the cute golfer Michelle Wie.
The first time Michelle Wie ever drove a car was when she was 17, she took a Hummer up a 60-degree ramp, rocked it over some felled logs and punched it through a mud flat, all with her parents sitting in the back seat. What a girl! While King James also got his $80,000 Hummer H2 in a very young age of 18, as a gift from her mother.
With the right touch, you can make your old truck looks like those athletes Hummer. Personally, I prefer to work on the interior design for my car (assuming I have one, duh!) , especially in the dashboard area. You know what will be awesome? By having a wood dash kits instead of usual chrome or carbon fiber one. Having a customized accessories will personalized your car and reflects who you really are.
Now, I recommend you to visit Carid website to find a suitable accessories for your car, and you'll be driving in style in no time.
Friday, February 19, 2010
IT WAS A GOODIE DAY
Dreams do come true. My good friends Travis and Ivey got me Goodie Mob tickets and the show finally came around.So impressive...
B.o.b is touring with them and I strongly suggest checking out his music.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)